In recent years, challenging control problems became solvable with deep reinforcement learning (RL). To be able to use RL for large-scale real-world applications, a certain degree of reliability in their performance is necessary. Reported results of state-of-the-art algorithms are often difficult to reproduce. One reason for this is that certain implementation details influence the performance significantly. Commonly, these details are not highlighted as important techniques to achieve state-of-the-art performance. Additionally, techniques from supervised learning are often used by default but influence the algorithms in a reinforcement learning setting in different and not well-understood ways. In this paper, we investigate the influence of certain initialization, input normalization, and adaptive learning techniques on the performance of state-of-the-art RL algorithms. We make suggestions which of those techniques to use by default and highlight areas that could benefit from a solution specifically tailored to RL.